By Bruce Nofsinger
Recently, newspapers across the country published
an opinion piece questioning the value of financial education — going so far as to say it can do more harm than good. The argument comes primarily from a paper by Loyola Law School professor,
Lauren Willis.
I am a firm believer in the value of financial education. And despite Professor Willis’ anti-financial education position, my hope is that this article and her paper encourage greater conversation about financial education. One positive of the economic crisis is increased attention on the subject, and we will all benefit from more skeptical and scholarly discourse.
That said, let me add my 2¢ to the conversation.
Financial Literacy: Does Not An Expert Make Professor Willis’ paper, “
Against Financial Literacy Education,” falsely equates financial literacy with financial expertise, stating that “consumers generally do not serve as their own doctors and lawyers and … generally should not serve as their own financial experts.” The article reinforced that notion by saying, “Make every American a financial whiz, the thinking goes, and credit bubbles never will bedevil us again.”

But the goal of financial education is NOT to make us all “financial experts.” If you define financial literacy this way — as the equivalent of being able to practice law or medicine — you’re doomed to disappointment.
There’s not an expectation that health education on oral hygiene, or nutrition, or physical fitness qualifies us to be dentists, dietitians, or personal trainers, right? We know that the intent is to help establish and reinforce knowledge and skills for us to build a foundation of good habits. Likewise, financial literacy is about having a foundational understanding (knowledge and skills) to navigate the world of financial decisions, including knowing when, where, and how to seek the expertise of, well … the experts.
However, even lowering the bar on what it means to be financially literate doesn’t mean that it’s easy to accomplish. Influencing behaviors — particularly those that require breaking bad habits and/or exercising discipline — poses a huge challenge. Still, that doesn’t mean that we should abandon the notion of instructional time for financial education.
Can financial education be ineffective?Of course. Any type of educational effort can be ineffective. While some clearly set the bar too high for what defines financial literacy, others set the bar far too low for what constitutes financial education.
Not enough financial education builds in real-world relevance to make concepts and experiences more tangible. Not enough extends beyond an emphasis on financial knowledge and embeds skill building into the learning process. Not enough financial education is meaningful enough to the participants to motivate them to take a proactive approach to their fiscal health.
Fortunately, though, there are examples of financial education that set the bar high — that understand the importance of blending knowledge and skills in ways that prompt reflection on how and why to be fiscally responsible within one’s specific circumstances. The examples that meet these criteria recognize that the intended audience must strongly influence how you engage them in the process. (They’re the antithesis of a one-size-fits-all approach.) The best efforts emphasize sk

ill building around audience-appropriate concepts and experiences.
Financial Education = Skill BuildingLet me give you an example of what I mean by using the concept of opportunity costs. Every purchase we make means that we can’t use that money for something else. Those something elses are our opportunity costs. (The concept also applies to how we choose to spend our time, but you get my point, right?) The experiences with and types of opportunity costs of a 15 year-old are drastically different from a 50 year-old. Still, no matter what our age, we should identify and evaluate our opportunity costs.
That’s a skill of a financially literate person — sadly, one that I think far too many people lack. Good financial education helps people develop and strengthen that skill, so as the circumstances and variety of opportunity costs change, the foundation exists to help people make good decisions, in part by helping us learn from bad decisions.
And I think it’d be a bad decision if we were to give up on financial education. Our current economic crisis gives a glimpse at the opportunity costs of failing to stress financial literacy through meaningful and ongoing financial education.