By Winn Maddrey, Executive VP, Topics Education 
In 2002,
Richard Florida penned the tome,
The Rise of the Creative Class, igniting a mini-industry of speaking gigs, consulting engagements, and market studies so that chambers of commerce, economic development groups, and well-funded metropolises could develop a program to recruit, grow, and maintain their fair – or more than fair – share of the knowledge worker. For the most part, this knowledge worker strategy was a hybrid business development/workforce development model combined with PR and the savvy marketing of a college professor, who’s since written the following sequels:
The Flight of the Creative Class and
Who’s Your City?, plus others.
Years ago, I worked on a regional project to do just that: attract, recruit, and retain the creative class to an area so that we could keep more than our fair share. Did the effort gain traction, attract dollars, and nearly explode with community interest? Absolutely. But why? I think a big reason for its success was – and still is – because launching such an initiative geared at a well-paid, well-educated, upwardly mobile segment of the workforce is relatively easy. And it’s “sexy.”
But what’s not sexy? Helping the less literate, the less educated, those in declining or dying industries. With this segment of the workforce, legacy ‘issues’ exist: pensions, asbestos, regulations, trade sanctions, quotas … you name the excuse du jour. Policy makers, if they’d wanted to look closely, could have done the hard work of researching and building a new model for those workers on the edge, those most threatened by wage pressure, those least mobile. That didn’t happen, and I think it’s mainly because such an effort is not one that will, in my opinion, ignite a movement or broad interest since it requires tough choices around tough issue

s.
While all of this innovative thinking around the Creative Class – this newly categorized group of workers who earn their living and contributed to the community by exercising their gray matter instead of muscular abilities – was going on, where was the fresh thinking and forward-looking planning for those wage-workers in, say, Detroit, Chicago, St. Louis, Akron, Pittsburgh, Columbia, Macon (GA), and others all across the United States?
Now fast forward to 2009. Looking at the buckets of money that the federal government and the states are pumping into workforce development, one would think that the policy-makers get it, that this money will push innovation to all sectors – including the hourly-wage sector – of the economy. But what I am hearing from multiple stimulus funding recipients contradicts this. What I hear is that the training wing of the workforce development party – the K-12 system, college/university, and community colleges – are being encouraged not to innovate, not to expand, not to reach, in their efforts to secure stimulus funding, but rather to dust off something that’s shovel-ready and get it into the market. Wow. What a disgrace. What a lost opportunity.
Please don’t get me wrong. I support the Obama Administration. I support proactive engagement and action to move our economy forward. I wish, though, that policy-makers would dig a little deeper and study what innovative ideas are out there, including those of Dr. Florida and others. Many of these existing strategies can be applied to the long-neglected – but immensely talented – hourly-wage sector in helping them to take on jobs that helps our country retain and grow its leadership around innovative industry. The supply and demand aspects of workforce development need to be reviewed. And we need to train these workers on how best to enter the new workforce development pipeline and what they should expect.
Training needs to be aligned to meet the needs and, in some cases, anticipated needs of the workforce. These needs include green jobs, language training, technical training, entrepreneurship training, networking training, and some broader (read less technical, or more soft skills) attributes than were in the 20th century curricula.
The workforce development world needs to be more strategic, to focus on making every worker better. How about a slogan like: “No Worker Left Behind?” That should be the workforce development psyche for today. And tomorrow.